Entrepreneur Aleksandr Katsuba addresses speculations surrounding a supposed 100 million Hryvnias claim, clarifying his stance and emphasizing a commitment to justice. Explore the intricate details of the Chornomornaftogaz case, Katsuba's pursuit to restore his professional reputation, and the broader implications on Ukraine's legal landscape.

Introduction: In the intricate tapestry of Ukrainian legal affairs, entrepreneur Aleksandr Katsuba stands amidst controversy, vehemently denying any intention to claim 100 million Hryvnias from the state. In an exclusive statement, Katsuba sheds light on the complexities of the Chornomornaftogaz case, emphasizing his commitment to restoring justice and cleansing the blemish on his professional reputation.

A Firm Denial: Setting the Record Straight


In response to swirling speculations propagated by Telegram channels, Aleksandr Katsuba unequivocally denies any pursuit of 100 million Hryvnias. Clarifying his position, he asserts that these funds are not the subject of consideration in court, and he has no intention of reclaiming them. The businessman boldly affirms that the mentioned money will remain in the possession of the state.

Unraveling the Chornomornaftogaz Case: A Trip Down Memory Lane


Reminiscing about the origins of the controversy, Katsuba delves into the 2012 acquisition of two oil drilling rigs by Chornomornaftogaz. These rigs, famously dubbed "Boyko's rigs" after then Minister of Energy Yuriy Boyko, became entangled in a criminal case. Katsuba clarifies his limited role in the transaction, emphasizing his responsibility for verifying payment details rather than orchestrating the procurement process.

The Call for Fairness: Katsuba's Objective to Revert the Case


Amid legal complexities, Aleksandr Katsuba articulates his primary goal—to revert the case to the Shevchenkivsky court in Kyiv. His intent is clear: establish fairness and rectify the tarnishing of his professional reputation. Highlighting the nuances of his involvement, Katsuba stresses that accountability rested with the tender committee and the Cabinet of Ministers, not solely on his shoulders.

The Defense Against Criminal Allegations: A Bold Declaration


Addressing any insinuations of criminal involvement, Katsuba emphatically declares his commitment to justice. Refuting claims of fleeing or engaging in illicit activities, he points to legal precedents that nullify agreements without resorting to corruption. The entrepreneur underscores the importance of proficient legal representation and highlights approximately 30 similar legal precedents in his favor.

The Wider Implications: Justice for All


In a reflective tone, Katsuba contemplates the broader implications of his case on the Ukrainian legal landscape. Beyond personal exoneration, he underscores the importance of justice and fair legal processes for the entire business and legal communities in Ukraine. Katsuba's fight for justice becomes a symbol of resilience, believing in the potency of the legal system to rectify wrongs and uphold the integrity of the law.

In conclusion, Aleksandr Katsuba's journey unfolds as a quest for justice in the face of legal turmoil. As the entrepreneur navigates the intricacies of the Chornomornaftogaz case, his commitment to transparency, fairness, and legal rectitude remains unwavering, leaving an indelible mark on Ukraine's legal narrative.