A groundbreaking MIT study reveals how prolonged use of ChatGPT weakens memory, creativity, and brain engagement, sparking concerns over AI's cognitive impact in education.
AI Tools Like ChatGPT May Be Reshaping the Way Our Brains Work, MIT Study Finds
The growing use of artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT is triggering fresh concerns among scientists, as new research reveals the technology may be quietly altering our cognitive abilities. A recent study conducted by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has unveiled evidence that prolonged reliance on large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT could be diminishing memory retention, reducing creativity, and weakening critical thinking skills—particularly in academic settings.
The study, titled The Cognitive Cost of Using LLMs, has already sparked significant debate within academic circles, raising questions about the long-term effects of AI use on human brain function.
ChatGPT Study Shows Reduced Brain Activity Linked to AI Use
In the MIT experiment, 54 university students were closely monitored over a four-month period. Participants were divided into three groups: those using ChatGPT, those relying on traditional search engines such as Google, and those working without technological assistance. Throughout the study, researchers recorded participants' brain activity using electroencephalography (EEG) to track cognitive engagement.
The results were striking. Students who regularly used ChatGPT to complete writing tasks exhibited significantly reduced neural activity in regions of the brain responsible for memory consolidation and executive functions. Compared to their peers, these participants demonstrated lower levels of mental engagement, struggled to recall information they had written themselves, and produced work that lacked originality.
Researchers described this pattern as a form of "mental passivity," suggesting that overreliance on AI-generated responses may lead to diminished cognitive effort and critical thinking.
Prolonged AI Use Could Hinder Cognitive Flexibility
One of the most troubling aspects of the study was the discovery that cognitive effects persisted even after participants stopped using AI tools. Students who initially used ChatGPT and later completed tasks without AI assistance continued to show poor brain engagement, suggesting that heavy reliance on AI may have lasting consequences on cognitive flexibility.
Conversely, those who worked without AI during the first phase of the study displayed higher levels of brain activity when eventually exposed to ChatGPT. Researchers believe this indicates that early cognitive engagement may help mitigate the potential risks of AI dependence.
ChatGPT: A Tool, Not a Replacement for Human Thinking
While AI tools like ChatGPT offer undeniable benefits in efficiency and accessibility, the MIT findings underscore the need for caution, particularly in educational and clinical environments.
Lead researchers behind the study emphasised that AI is most effective when used as a complement to human thinking, rather than a substitute for it. Overreliance, they warn, risks creating intellectual "echo chambers" and stifling the development of essential cognitive skills.
As artificial intelligence continues to reshape the academic landscape, experts argue that finding the right balance between technology and active human engagement will be key to ensuring future generations do not sacrifice critical thinking and originality in the pursuit of convenience.
The study's revelations have already ignited global debate, with educators, policymakers, and neuroscientists calling for further research and clearer guidelines on the responsible integration of AI into learning environments.
The message from MIT researchers is clear: while ChatGPT and similar tools offer unprecedented opportunities, they must be wielded with care to avoid undermining the very cognitive abilities that drive human progress.

Comments